No one's asking me, but I'm not really too thrilled with the
talk around HRC being offered the Secretary of State Cabinet post by
Pres.-elect Barack. (Can I call you Barack? It's how you signed all your SMS
messages to me.) She's damn smart and a supreme policy wonk, probably more so
than you on both counts. But I wouldn't say her Senate record is decorated with
international diplomacy winners. May I remind you she voted in support of the
war in Iraq?
Domestic policy has always been her stronger suit and
interest from her earliest post-grad days. A quick scroll through her online bio confirns: Children's Defense Fund staff
attorney, Legal Aid board member, children's and women's advocate. And in the
Senate, she has strongly supported domestic issues from raising the minimum
wage to the expansion of health care coverage. Tenure on the Armed Services
Committee aside, I just don't come away with a sense of internationalism that
the last three Secretaries of State have had.
I do feel she can contribute more outside of the Senate,
given its rules on seniority and her low standing on that score but State is
the wrong spot for her. Now where would a deep thinker, progressive-leaning legal mind be better suited. Paging Justice Stevens, Ready for retirement? Justice Clinton, anyone?