It's now really obvious that I don't have a career as a political pundit, and thank Krishna for that. My reticence in Senator Clinton's nomination to State was summed up pretty well in one sentence by David Sanger in his news analysis piece in yesterday's New York Times.
"Of all the choices Mr. Obama has made so far, it is the selection of Mrs. Clinton that appears the biggest gamble, in part because she has never had to engage in the give-and-take of high-stakes diplomacy, and in part because no one really knows how she will mesh with the Obama White House." (emphasis mine)
"Of all the choices Mr. Obama has made so far, it is the selection of Mrs. Clinton that appears the biggest gamble, in part because she has never had to engage in the give-and-take of high-stakes diplomacy, and in part because no one really knows how she will mesh with the Obama White House." (emphasis mine)
