Results tagged “Radiohead” from Irish Violet

I've written about Radiohead before: sort of recently about the digital download of In Rainbows; and much less recently (and much more succinctly) about their 2001 release, Amnesiac. Seven years ago I described them in five words: I still don't get it. At the time I was struggling with their first forays away from typical rock song structure, and an oft-overwhelming sense of doom and claustrophobia in their music and lyrics, when I could penetrate them at all. And, chiefly, not understanding how Kid A debuted at #1 on Billboard's charts the previous year. A colleague described Kid A at the time: the most nonlinear album ever to debut at number one. I had already basically dismissed, the OK Computer and Kid A, but I kept returning to them with each release. With Amnesiac, I finally really liked what I heard on a Radiohead album, though couldn't connect that album or any of the others with their superstardom stature. Radiohead don't play to the least common pop denominator of "American Idol."

In the years since my perplexed dismissal of their worldwide acclaim, I'm not sure I'm any closer to solving the riddle, or riddles. Their astounding success doesn't sum from the density, diversity and aural challenge of their output. Successive releases since Amnesiac (Hail to the Thief and In Rainbows) are something of a mash-up of the earlier guitar-driven albums and the experimental explorations of Kid A/Amnesiac. The music is at best modestly more accessible for a casual listener. Singer Thom Yorke's vocals, when not delivered at a near-mumble, are often buried in the mix. Sonic boundaries are pushed, most prominently by both Yorke and lead guitarist Jonny Greenwood, who also plays several other instruments, like rock band staples the glockenspiel, viola, and ondes Martenot. But hey, at least the song titles are uplifting: "We Suck Young Blood," "Bodysnatchers," "A Punch Up at a Wedding."

Coldplay it ain't. Nor does Radiohead traffic in the anthem sing-alongs of U2, the shy-boy relationship rock of Death Cab for Cutie, whatever is passing for "emo" these days, nor the acoustic styles of Jack Johnson. But the surfer-acoustic dude is the only other performer headlining as many summer festivals this year as Radiohead.

In between festival dates, the band rolled through Auburn, Washington, a suburban outpost about 35 miles from Seattle where I took in the Radiohead spectacle (and some pictures) with about 18,000 others who braved horrible weather and worse transit planning to get to the venue. And spectacle it was, with an intricate light show (environmentally friendlier LED, of course), roadies scurrying everywhere with instruments and gear, and video screens behind the stage projecting the band members from multiple angles, not all glamorous. We were treated to Yorke's schnozz and lazy eye up close and personal during "You and Whose Army."

Fortunately, the effects took a back seat to the music. When they wanted to, Radiohead provided a serious groove. Yorke was shadowbox dancing right from the opening number ("15 Step," the first track from In Rainbows) and a sizable chunk of the band's set was full of rollicking drums, prominent bass and ass-shaking rhythm. Notably, "There There" had guitarist Ed O'Brien and Greenwood bashing on snare kits. And there were plenty of songs at non hip-swiveling BPM that could have been concert momentum killers. The audience was rapt and chatter-free in my general vicinity. Outside of the lyrics themselves, there was no speechifying save for a brief mention of the WTO protest in Seattle a decade ago. Surprising, especially for a band both with its available bully pulpit and general against-the-grain stance. The politics were left to the merch table where Sigg water bottles and T-shirts made from recycled material were for sale.

I don't know that Radiohead will ever be an all-time favorite of mine, or even favorite in a moment of time. Sometimes I just need the simplicity of three chords and the truth. But I keep finding myself drawn in to the music with an interest in exploring and deciphering, though readily admit to being nonplussed at its road blocks as well. Radiohead's popularity remains a riddle for me. The mirror's still cracked. But it's seven years on and time to worry less about the mathematics of success and spend more time with the tunes.

Please Tip Your Guitarists Well

|

(originally published 2 October 2007 here)

Radiohead are about to launch an interesting experiment; the latest in a series of attempts to uncover a new revenue model for the music industry. Next Wednesday, October 10th, the band's latest album, In Rainbows, will be released. Initially, it will only be available as a digital download, and purchasers will decide what they want to pay. No, really, you can pay Radiohead whatever you want to have access their newest tracks.

News bulletin: CD sales are sinking. OK, not so newsworthy.

Why? For one, there is a ton a free music to be had quite easily via the internet: the still-popular file sharing programs like Limewire, bit torrent sites that specialize in audio and video full concert performances, the opportunity to stream music from everywhere - be it KCRW's renowned show "Morning Becomes Eclectic" or what's hot in Croatia right now - or be your own DJ on countless sites including lastfm and Live365, and the unlimited exposure to new music through Pandora's Music Genome Project.

Oh, and then there's that iTunes store. I know, iTunes song downloads aren't free, but its runaway success has both spawned others experimenting with both subscription and pay-per-song models(Rhapsody, Amazon, eMusic), and has certainly given the record industry pause about how it distributes and sells its "content."

So will the virtual tip jar work? For a while these proliferated on content web sites in the early '00's in an egalitarian (far-fetched?) hope that the effort put into the sites you visited on your employer's nickel were worth at least as much as the change from your latte that you tossed into your barista's counter cup adorned with some guilt-inducing and not terribly funny phrase. Perhaps the most lucrative tip-jar collector at the time was conservative columnist Andrew Sullivan's blog, but today he's sponsored in part by the Atlantic.

The cynic will point out that it doesn't matter, financially speaking, for Radiohead, one of the pop music universe's critical and commercial successes. In Rainbows will be released as a "traditional" CD to stores in early 2008, though the band is currently without a label. Should that matter? For the über-fan/collector, there is also a deluxe package including two CDs, one with additional tracks plus photos and original artwork, two vinyl discs with all of the same songs, plus a lyric book, another goodie or two and the download code to get digital files for the low, low price of £40, north of $80 at today's stellar dollar exchange rates.

I tip my hat to Radiohead's tip jar, exploring and expanding the boundaries for musicians to distribute and be compensated for that which gives me, and millions of others, untold joy. I also plan on filling the tip jar for my copy of In Rainbows. How much should I pitch in?